Today, I am announcing my decision as
to which party, if any, I will associate myself with in my work in the
United States Senate. Before doing so, however, I want to outline my
thinking on this issue and set out the principles that have guided my
decision.
In
answering this question repeatedly during the campaign, I established
two basic criteria—that I wanted to maintain my independence as long and
as thoroughly as possible while at the same time being effective in my
representation of Maine.
The first option I considered was
whether I could literally go it alone, not align myself with either
party and operate entirely outside the current partisan structure of the
Senate. Although tempting in many ways, it has become apparent--from
extensive research into Senate rules and precedents as well as
discussions with individuals familiar with the workings of the
Senate--that this simply would not be practical and, in fact, would
severely compromise my effectiveness on behalf of Maine.
The principal disadvantage of this
approach is that I would likely be largely excluded from the committee
process which is where most of the work in any legislative body gets
done. Occasionally, my vote would prove crucial and be eagerly sought by
both sides, but in the long run, I would be relegated to the sidelines
as the day-to-day
work of the Senate was done by others.
The second question, then, is which
side to choose--and the outcome of last week’s elections in some ways
makes this decision relatively easy. In the situation where one party
has a clear majority and effectiveness is an important criteria,
affiliating with the majority makes the most sense. The majority has
more committee slots to fill, has more control over what bills get
considered, and more control over the Senate schedule.
But the question
remains, what does caucusing mean and how does this decision affect my
intention to remain as independent as possible? In order to answer this,
I had substantial conversations with the two independent Senators
currently serving in the Senate, both of whom are affiliated with the
Democratic caucus, Joe Lieberman of
Connecticut and Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Both confirmed that the
Democratic caucus generally and its leadership in particular had
consistently allowed them to maintain their independent positions and
had never forced positions upon them in the name of party loyalty.
Secondly, I had lengthy discussions
with the Democratic leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, as well as former
majority leader George Mitchell on this very question. I came away from
these conversations reassured that my independence would be respected
and no party line commitment would be required or expected.
And so I have decided to affiliate
with the Democratic Caucus because doing so will allow me to take
independent positions on issues as they arise and at the same time be an
effective representative of the people of Maine.
One final word. By associating myself
with one side, I am not in automatic opposition to the other. In the
situation of a Republican House, a Democratic Senate but with
substantial powers in the minority, and a Democratic president, no one
party can control the outcome of our collective deliberations. As Bill
Clinton might say, it’s just
arithmetic. In fact, this situation has only two possible
outcomes—action based upon good-faith compromise or no action resulting
from political deadlock.
And this latter is simply
unacceptable to the American people.
We must find a way to act because
many of the problems before us—the debt and deficit is the best
example—have a time fuse; the longer we avoid acting, the worse they
get. In this case no decision is, itself, a decision, and it’s almost
certainly the wrong one.
The challenges before us are too
great and the stakes too high to allow partisan differences to keep us
from finding common ground--and I hope that in a small way I may be able
to act as a bridge between the parties, an honest broker to help nudge
us toward solutions.
I have talked with more than a dozen
Senators of both parties in the past three days and have been impressed
by their seriousness of purpose and good faith desire to serve the
country. I am humbled and honored to be among them and look forward to
working with each of them in the months and years ahead as we struggle
to fulfill the
fundamental promise of the Constitution—to form a more perfect union.