|
Jon Leibowitz, FTC:
Facebook Settles Consumer Privacy Charges
November 30, 2011
The
social networking service Facebook has agreed to settle Federal Trade
Commission charges that it deceived consumers by telling them they could
keep their information on Facebook private, and then repeatedly allowing
it to be shared and made public. The proposed settlement requires
Facebook to take several steps to make sure it lives up to its promises
in the future, including giving consumers clear and prominent notice and
obtaining consumers' express consent before their information is shared
beyond the privacy settings they have established.
The FTC's eight-count complaint against Facebook is part of the agency's
ongoing effort to make sure companies live up to the privacy promises
they make to American consumers. It charges that the claims that
Facebook made were unfair and deceptive, and violated federal law.
"Facebook is obligated to keep the promises about privacy that it makes
to its hundreds of millions of users," said Jon Leibowitz, Chairman of
the FTC. "Facebook's innovation does not have to come at the expense of
consumer privacy. The FTC action will ensure it will not."
The FTC complaint lists a number of instances in which Facebook
allegedly made promises that it did not keep:
- In December 2009,
Facebook changed its website so certain information that
users may have designated as private – such as their
Friends List – was made public. They didn't warn users
that this change was coming, or get their approval in
advance.
- Facebook
represented that third-party apps that users' installed
would have access only to user information that they
needed to operate. In fact, the apps could access nearly
all of users' personal data – data the apps didn't need.
- Facebook told
users they could restrict sharing of data to limited
audiences – for example with "Friends Only." In fact,
selecting "Friends Only" did not prevent their
information from being shared with third-party
applications their friends used.
- Facebook had a
"Verified Apps" program & claimed it certified the
security of participating apps. It didn't.
- Facebook promised
users that it would not share their personal information
with advertisers. It did.
- Facebook claimed
that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts,
their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But
Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users
had deactivated or deleted their accounts.
- Facebook claimed
that it complied with the U.S.- EU Safe Harbor Framework
that governs data transfer between the U.S. and the
European Union. It didn't.
The proposed
settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy
claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it
changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain
periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent,
third-party auditors for the next 20 years.
Specifically, under the proposed settlement, Facebook is:
- barred from
making misrepresentations about the privacy or security
of consumers' personal information;
- required to
obtain consumers' affirmative express consent before
enacting changes that override their privacy
preferences;
- required to
prevent anyone from accessing a user's material more
than 30 days after the user has deleted his or her
account;
- required to
establish and maintain a comprehensive privacy program
designed to address privacy risks associated with the
development and management of new and existing products
and services, and to protect the privacy and
confidentiality of consumers' information; and
- required, within
180 days, and every two years after that for the next 20
years, to obtain independent, third-party audits
certifying that it has a privacy program in place that
meets or exceeds the requirements of the FTC order, and
to ensure that the privacy of consumers' information is
protected.
The proposed order
also contains standard record-keeping provisions to allow the FTC to
monitor compliance with its order.
Facebook's
privacy practices were the subject of complaints filed with the FTC by
the Electronic Privacy Information Center and a coalition of consumer
groups.
The Commission vote to accept the consent agreement package containing
the proposed consent order for public comment was 4-0. The FTC will
publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal
Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30
days, beginning today and continuing through December 30, 2011 after
which the Commission will decide whether to make the proposed consent
order final. Interested parties can submit comments online or in paper
form by following the instructions in the "Invitation To Comment" part
of the "Supplementary Information" section. Comments in paper form
should be mailed or delivered to: Federal Trade Commission, Office of
the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in
paper form near the end of the public comment period be sent by courier
or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security precautions. |