|
Dean Turner, Symantec:
Global Critical Infrastructure Providers Less Aware and Engaged in
Government Programs
November 1, 2011
Findings
of the 2011 Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Survey found a drop
in awareness and engagement on a global basis as measured by the CIP
Participation Index. Compared to 2010, companies surveyed this year show
a CIP Participation Index of 82 percent in government protection
programs, down 18 points from last year. Critical infrastructure
providers come from industries that are of such importance that if their
cyber networks were successfully attacked and disabled, it would result
in an actual threat to national security.
Symantec’s Critical Infrastructure Protection
Survey PDF
“The findings of this survey are somewhat alarming, given recent attacks
like Nitro and Duqu that have targeted critical infrastructure
providers,” said Dean Turner, director, Global Intelligence Network for
Symantec. “Having said that, limitations on manpower and resources as
mentioned by respondents help explain why critical infrastructure
providers have had to prioritize and focus their efforts on more
day-to-day cyber threats. However, we think that targeted attacks
against critical infrastructure providers in the form of Stuxnet, Nitro
and Duqu will continue. Businesses and governments around the world
should be very aggressive in their efforts to promote and coordinate
protection of critical industry cyber networks. These latest attacks are
likely just the beginning of more targeted attacks directed at critical
infrastructure.”
Survey Highlights:
- Lower awareness and
engagement in government CIP programs. This year,
companies are generally less aware of their government’s CIP
programs. Thirty-six percent of respondents were somewhat or
completely aware of the government critical infrastructure
plans being discussed in their country compared to 55
percent last year. In 2011, 37 percent of companies are
completely or significantly engaged, versus 56 percent in
2010.
- Slightly more ambivalence
about government CIP programs. The survey also
revealed that companies are more ambivalent in 2011 than
they were in 2010 about government CIP programs. For
example, when asked to voice their opinion about government
CIP programs, 42 percent had no opinion or were neutral.
Also, companies are now slightly less willing to cooperate
with CIP programs than they were one year ago (57 versus 66
percent).
- Global Organizations feel
less prepared. It is not surprising that as an
organization’s assessment of the threat drops, their
readiness drops as well. Overall readiness on a global scale
fell an average of eight points (from 60 to 63 percent in
2011 compared with 68 to 70 percent in 2010).
Recommendations to ensure resiliency
against critical infrastructure cyber attacks:
- Develop and enforce IT policies
and automate compliance processes. By prioritizing risks and
defining policies that span across all locations,
organizations can enforce policies through built-in
automation and workflow and not only identify threats but
remediate incidents as they occur or anticipate them before
they happen.
- Protect information proactively by
taking an information-centric approach to protect both
information and interactions. Taking a content-aware
approach to protecting information is key in knowing who
owns the information, where sensitive information resides,
who has access, and how it is coming in or leaving your
organization.
- Manage systems by implementing
secure operating environments, distributing and enforcing
patch levels, automating processes to streamline efficiency,
and monitoring and reporting on system status.
- Protect the infrastructure by
securing endpoints, messaging and Web environments. In
addition, defending critical internal servers and
implementing the ability to back up and recover data should
be priorities. Organizations also need the visibility and
security intelligence to respond to threats rapidly.
- Ensure 24x7 availability.
Organizations should implement testing methods that are
non-disruptive and they can reduce complexity by automating
failover. Virtual environments should be treated the same as
a physical environment, showing the need for organizations
to adopt more cross-platform and cross-environment tools, or
standardize on fewer platforms.
- Develop an information management
strategy that includes an information retention plan and
policies. Organizations need to stop using backup for
archiving and legal holds, implement deduplication
everywhere to free resources, use a full-featured archive
system and deploy data loss prevention technologies.
Recommendations for governments to
promote critical infrastructure protection:
-
Governments
should continue to put forth the resources to establish
government critical infrastructure programs.
- The majority of critical
infrastructure providers confirm that they are aware of
government critical infrastructure programs.
- Furthermore, a majority of
critical infrastructure providers support efforts by the
government to develop protection programs.
- Governments should partner with
industry associations and private enterprise groups to
disseminate information to raise awareness of government CIP
organizations and plans, with specifics about how a response
would work in the face of a national cyber attack, what the
roles of government would be, who the specific contacts are
for various industries at a regional and national level, and
how government and private business would share information
in the event of an emergency.
- Governments should emphasize that
security is not enough to stay resilient in the face of
today’s cyber attacks. Governments should also emphasize to
critical infrastructure providers and enterprises that their
information be stored, backed up, organized, prioritized,
and that proper identity and access control processes are in
place.
Symantec’s Critical
Infrastructure Protection Survey is the result of research conducted in
August and September 2011 by Applied Research, which surveyed C-level,
IT professionals in SMBs and enterprises in 14 industries specifically
designated as critical infrastructure industries. The report was
designed to examine awareness, engagement, and readiness with regards to
government CIP programs. The survey included 3,475 organizations from 37
countries in North America, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa), Asia
Pacific, and Latin America.
The CIP Participation Index combines a blend of questions that gauge how
engaged organizations are with their government’s CIP programs. It is
normalized to 2010, our base model year. By convention, the 2010 CIP
Participation Index is 100 percent. |