|
David Geltner, MIT: Q2
2010 MIT/CRE Commercial Property Price Index Up 17%
August 3, 2010
Transaction prices of commercial
properties sold by major institutional investors surged over 17 percent
in the second quarter of 2010, according to an index developed and
published by the MIT Center for Real Estate (MIT/CRE).

The 17.3 percent increase in the
transactions-based index (TBI) for the second quarter is very near the
all-time quarterly record for the 105 quarters in the index history
(since 1984). The record is a 17.8 percent jump in the second quarter of
2005 in the midst of the property boom. However, transaction volume in
the investment property population tracked by the index was down for the
second month in a row and remains at a very low level by historical
standards. “Usually price and volume move together in the property
market, so the overall result sends a mixed signal,” said MIT Professor
David Geltner, Director of Research at the Center for Real Estate. The
latest pricing result puts the index at 159.6, still 31 percent below
its mid-2007 peak of 230.26 (against an inception value of 100 in the
first quarter of 1984). According to Geltner, “the mixed signal likely
reflects the split nature of the U.S. commercial property market these
days, with high investor demand for safe investments pushing prices
sharply up from the deep bottom for “trophy” buildings — prime
properties fully leased out to solid tenants — while distress in the
broader commercial property market and concerns about the economic
future keep prices down in other segments of the market.”
MIT/CRE publishes not only the price index based on closed deals, but
also compiles indices that separately gauge movements on the demand side
and the supply side of the institutional property market. The
demand-side index tracks the changes in prices that potential buyers are
willing to pay (sometimes called a “constant-liquidity” index of the
market, because it tracks how much prices would have to change to keep a
constant ability to sell as many properties at the same rate of trading
volume). “The demand index can be considered a gauge of market
sentiment, at least among the all-important buy-side of the market,”
said Geltner. That index fell steadily for eight quarters from mid-2007
to mid-2009, to 48 percent below its peak, but then rebounded sharply up
12 percent in the third quarter of 2009. It jumped even more in the
second quarter of 2010, rising 17.6 percent, to over 21 percent above
its mid-2009 bottom, reflecting the previously noted strong demand for
high quality assets viewed as safe investments.
The
supply-side index, which gauges the prices property owners are willing
to accept, also was up a near-record 17.1 percent. The nearly identical
movement on the two sides of the market explains why trading volume did
not increase. Geltner noted: “Such a sharp rise in supply-side
reservation prices suggests the deep-pocket investors that characterize
the TBI property owners are still largely holding properties off the
market, not wanting to sell at prices that they still view as depressed,
or anyway not wanting to move money from real estate to stocks or bonds
in the current economic climate.”
The TBI tracks the prices that institutions such as pension funds pay or
receive when transacting commercial properties such as shopping centers,
apartment complexes and office towers. The MIT Center’s TBI is based on
prices of National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF)
properties sold each quarter from the property database that underlies
the NCREIF Property Index (NPI), and also makes use of the appraisal
information for all of the current approximately 6,000 NCREIF
properties. Such an index — national, quarterly, transaction-based and
by property type, and tracking demand and supply as well as prices — had
never existed prior to its launch by MIT in February 2006. NCREIF
supported development of the index as a useful tool for research and
decision-making in the industry. |