|
Microsoft Withdraws
Yahoo! Bid May
5, 2008
Microsoft
withdrew its offer for Yahoo after talks between broke down on Saturday.
The merger would have tackled a common rival Google. Now, Microsoft will
go it alone in competing with Google.
Google commanded
71.2% of U.S. search advertising revenue in 2007, and Yahoo saw
8.9% of such revenue, according to eMarketer.
Yahoo's shares traded
at about $19 a share before Microsoft's bid, and were at $28.67 on
Friday. At the market opening, Yahoo shares traded at $23.02 per share,
down 19.7 percent from Friday's close.
Roy Bostock, Chairman
of Yahoo! issued the following statement in response to Microsoft's
announcement that it has withdrawn its proposal to acquire Yahoo!:
“We remain focused on maximizing shareholder value and pursuing
strategic opportunities that position Yahoo! for success and leadership
in its markets. From the beginning of this process, our independent
board and our management have been steadfast in our belief that
Microsoft’s offer undervalued the company and we are pleased that so
many of our shareholders joined us in expressing that view. Yahoo! is
profitable, growing, and executing well on its strategic plan to capture
the large opportunities in the relatively young online advertising
market. Our solid results for the first quarter of 2008 and increased
full year 2008 operating cash flow outlook reflect the progress the
company is making. Today, Yahoo! has:
-
a refined strategic focus to
drive enhanced volume and yield;
-
reorganized to focus its
efforts on its most promising products and services;
-
invested in innovations
designed to revolutionize display advertising and facilitate
closing the competitive gap in search; and
-
enhanced expense and resource
management to support improved profitability.”
Jerry Yang,
co-founder and chief executive officer, Yahoo! added, “I am incredibly
proud of the way our team has come together over the last three months.
This process has underscored our unique and valuable strategic position.
With the distraction of Microsoft’s unsolicited proposal now behind us,
we will be able to focus all of our energies on executing the most
important transition in our history so that we can maximize our
potential to the benefit of our shareholders, employees, partners and
users.” “We
continue to believe that our proposed acquisition made sense for
Microsoft, Yahoo! and the market as a whole. Our goal in pursuing a
combination with Yahoo! was to provide greater choice and innovation in
the marketplace and create real value for our respective stockholders
and employees,” said Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of
Microsoft. 
“Despite our best efforts, including raising our bid by roughly $5
billion, Yahoo! has not moved toward accepting our offer. After careful
consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo! do not make
sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders,
employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal,” said
Ballmer.
“We have a talented team in place and a compelling plan to grow our
business through innovative new services and strategic transactions with
other business partners. While Yahoo! would have accelerated our
strategy, I am confident that we can continue to move forward toward our
goals,” Ballmer said.
“We are investing heavily in new tools and Web experiences, we have
dramatically improved our search performance and advertiser
satisfaction, and we will continue to build our scale through organic
growth and partnerships,” said Kevin Johnson, Microsoft president for
platforms and services.
Below is the text of the letter from Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to
Yahoo! CEO Jerry Yang.
May 3, 2008
Mr. Jerry Yang
CEO and Chief Yahoo
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Dear Jerry:
After over three months, we have reached the conclusion of the process
regarding a possible combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!.
I first want to convey my personal thanks to you, your management team,
and Yahoo!’s Board of Directors for your consideration of our proposal.
I appreciate the time and attention all of you have given to this
matter, and I especially appreciate the time that you have invested
personally. I feel that our discussions this week have been particularly
useful, providing me for the first time with real clarity on what is and
is not possible.
I am disappointed that Yahoo! has not moved towards accepting our offer.
I first called you with our offer on January 31 because I believed that
a combination of our two companies would have created real value for our
respective shareholders and would have provided consumers, publishers,
and advertisers with greater innovation and choice in the marketplace.
Our decision to offer a 62 percent premium at that time reflected the
strength of these convictions.
In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our
offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this
collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately
another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the
current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a
premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock
closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final
position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or
at least another $4 per share above our $33.00 offer.
Also, after giving this week’s conversations further thought, it is
clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer
directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a
protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our
discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you
would take steps that would make Yahoo! undesirable as an acquisition
for Microsoft.
We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a
“hostile” bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead
to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered
by Yahoo! today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant
search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo! undesirable to us
for a number of reasons:
• First, it would fundamentally undermine Yahoo!’s own strategy and
long-term viability by encouraging advertisers to use Google as opposed
to your Panama paid search system. This would also fragment your search
advertising and display advertising strategies and the ecosystem
surrounding them. This would undermine the reliance on your display
advertising business to fuel future growth.
• Given this, it would impair Yahoo’s ability to retain the talented
engineers working on advertising systems that are important to our
interest in a combination of our companies.
• In addition, it would raise a host of regulatory and legal problems
that no acquirer, including Microsoft, would want to inherit. Among
other things, this would consolidate market share with the
already-dominant paid search provider in a manner that would reduce
competition and choice in the marketplace.
• This would also effectively enable Google to set the prices for key
search terms on both their and your search platforms and, in the
process, raise prices charged to advertisers on Yahoo. In addition to
whatever resulting legal problems, this seems unwise from a business
perspective unless in fact one simply wishes to use this as a vehicle to
exit the paid search business in favor of Google.
• It could foreclose any chance of a combination with any other search
provider that is not already relying on Google’s search services.
Accordingly, your apparent plan to pursue such an arrangement in the
event of a proxy contest or exchange offer leads me to the firm decision
not to pursue such a path. Instead, I hereby formally withdraw
Microsoft’s proposal to acquire Yahoo!.
We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business
at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place and potentially
through strategic transactions with other business partners.
I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative
put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for
their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your
stockholders have left significant value on the table.
But clearly a deal is not to be.
Thank you again for the time we have spent together discussing this.
Sincerely yours,
Steven A. Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
Microsoft Corporation |