|
Rich Terrorist, Poor
Terrorist
April 7, 2008
Cause of terrorism may not be linked to poverty
New research suggests political freedom and geographic factors
contribute significantly to causes of terrorism, challenging the common
view that terrorism is rooted in poverty.
Terrorism is motivated by
political freedom more than economic conditions
"There is no significant relationship between a country's wealth and
level of terrorism once other factors like the country's level of
political freedom are taken into account," says Alberto Abadie, public
policy professor at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.
Abadie's review of the World Market Research Centre's Global Terrorism
Index found no clear correlation between terrorism and poverty. Abadie's
research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).
The finding comes despite several international meetings designed to
address issues of terrorism and poverty. For example, in March 2002,
leaders from more than 50 nations met at a development summit in
Monterrey, Mexico to call for more aid to poor countries to help
eliminate extreme poverty as a motivation for terrorism.
Michael K. Moore, then the head of the World Trade Organization,
reportedly told delegates, "Poverty in all its forms is the greatest
single threat to peace, security, democracy, human rights and the
environment."
But Abadie says the big takeaway from his study for policymakers is that
although development aid is important, it is not clear that it is an
effective tool for reducing terrorism, at least not in the short-run. He
says more attention should be paid to political freedom because it
"correlates with terrorism, but in a complicated way."
"Nations with very high or very low levels of political freedom tend to
experience little terrorism," says Abadie. He points to North Korea as
an authoritarian country with a low level of terrorism. He speculates
that the repressive tactics used to eliminate political dissent may help
keep terrorism at bay.
On the other hand, nations similar to Iraq with intermediate levels of
political freedom, or that are transitioning from high to low or low to
high levels of political freedom produce conditions more favorable for
terrorism.
Abadie couldn't say whether recent U.S. actions in Iraq would eliminate
terrorism in the long run as that country transitions to a new
government with presumably more political freedom.
"It's not clear," he says. "It's true that countries with higher levels
of political freedom tend to have lower levels of terrorism. However,
actively intervening from the outside to increase the level of political
freedom in a society may have unforeseeable consequences."
"People say ‘poverty breeds terrorism' and that seems obvious, but when
one looks at the data, it has to be questioned if it's really true,"
says Nancy Lutz, economics program director at NSF. "In fact, the data
tell us that there's no link between poverty and terrorism, which
suggests that attempts to reduce terrorism by fighting poverty will not
work."
Abadie makes the point by underscoring conditions in his native Basque
Country of Spain, which has endured terrorism for almost half a century
as groups persistently generate violence as a way to promote Basque
independence. The Basque Country is one of Spain's richest regions.
"While we may not be able to fight terrorism by fighting poverty, we do
have a strong economic incentive for fighting terrorism," says Lutz,
pointing out the widespread consequences of terrorist acts. "Even though
the physical damage from a terrorist attack is usually confined to a
small area, we can see much larger effects in the whole economy," she
says.
Chicago is an example. While no one was injured in the city on Sept. 11,
2001, when terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in New York and
the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., those events severely affected real
estate markets in Chicago. A separate NSF-funded analysis of the area by
Abadie and Sofia Dermisi of Roosevelt University in Chicago showed the
attacks created a large increase in the perception of terrorist risk in
Chicago's central business district and changed decisions about where
high-end office tenants wanted to locate.
Abadie and Dermisi looked at three of the most distinctively tall
buildings in Chicago, as well as other nearby commercial buildings and
found the attacks caused a significant increase in their vacancy rates.
The high vacancy rates persisted through mid-2006, the end of the study
period.

"If I were a Chicago alderman," says Lutz, "I might argue from this
study that zoning approval for additional extremely tall buildings is a
bad idea on economic grounds."
In his research, Abadie found more than 1,700 terrorist acts occurring
in 2003, as reported by the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of
Terrorism were domestic incidents, where both the terrorists and their
victims lived in the same country. Additionally, the database registered
only 240 international terrorist acts in that year.
Abadie also found evidence that terrorist activities are more common in
areas with certain geographic characteristics. Areas difficult to access
like Colombia's tropical jungles or mountainous terrain like that in
Afghanistan may offer safe haven to terrorist groups.
Such areas may facilitate training, and provide funding through other
illegal activities, like the production and trafficking of drugs such as
cocaine and opiates. |