Data-Stealing?
Battery-Draining? An
Anti-VPN Campaign Sweeps
Russian Social Media
August 1, 2022
A decade ago, 261
websites were blocked by
the Russian government.
Last year, that number
surpassed 70,000,
Internet-freedom
activists say, while
more than 5,400 sites
have been blocked since
Russia launched its
massive invasion of
Ukraine in late
February.
In response, a growing
number of Russians have
turned to VPNs – virtual
private networks that
mask Internet users’
locations and enable
them to view blocked
websites. According to
The Times of London, 24
million Russians – about
one-quarter of all adult
Internet users --
employed a VPN in May,
up from a pre-invasion
figure of 1.6 million.
The market-research
service AppMagic
reported that Russians
downloaded VPNs more
than 12 million times in
the first three weeks of
July alone.
President Vladimir Putin
has said in the past
that straightforward
prohibitions are not the
best way to restrict
Internet use, saying the
state must be smarter
and subtler to achieve
its aims, and his
government has been
reluctant to ban VPNs
outright, wary of
alienating the many
Russians who use them to
access Western social
media and other sites
for entertainment
purposes.
A 2017 law made it
illegal for VPNs to
provide access to
blocked sites, but it
put the obligation to
comply on VPN-service
companies, an obligation
they have largely
ignored. The government
has, however, blocked
over 20 individual VPNs.
Now, activists say, a
soft-power initiative
has been launched to
frighten Russians away
from VPNs and herd them
back toward
government-controlled
information resources.
“If you, like me,
downloaded a VPN after
all the hype, I
congratulate you on
being screwed,” the
blogger Batya-Goda, with
about 46,000 followers,
wrote on July 6 in a
now-deleted social-media
post. “I was happy for
about 20 minutes, using
all my favorite apps.
But then everything fell
apart -- nothing works,
other apps got hung up,
my battery drained like
mad, Internet access
slowed. A friend of mine
in IT said VPNs --
particularly the free
ones -- sell user data.”
Batya-Goda called VPNs
“the problem of 2022.”
Dozens of similar posts
denouncing VPNs have
flooded the popular
social network VKontakte
and others, including
posts from
local-government
officials.
Nikita Danyuk, an
academic and a member of
the government’s
advisory Public Chamber,
was quoted by numerous
pro-Kremlin outlets this
month warning of the
danger of data theft and
denouncing VPNs as “the
gray cardinals of the
criminal world.
“Russians need to
understand that the data
VPNs take does not
remain in Russia and can
end up in various hands,
including those of scam
call centers, spy
agencies, and so on,”
Danyuk was quoted as
saying.
On July 20, the
pro-Kremlin Gazeta.ru
website quoted Artyom
Geller, a technical
adviser to the
Federation Council and
the lead designer of the
president’s Kremlin.ru
website, as asserting
that the United States
was financing free VPN
services in order to get
“access to the data of
users in other
countries” and to
exercise “ideological
influence” over Internet
users abroad.
Geller seemed to be
referring to the Open
Technology Fund (OTF), a
U.S. nonprofit that is a
grantee of the U.S.
Agency for Global Media
(USAGM), which also
oversees RFE/RL and
other U.S. international
broadcasters. According
to its website, OTF
supports expanded access
to the Internet,
“including tools to
circumvent website
blocks, connection
blackouts, and
widespread censorship.”
According to a Reuters
report in June, OTF has
provided several million
dollars to three VPN
companies since the
February 24 invasion of
Ukraine.
OTF President Laura
Cunningham was quoted as
saying that the support
was necessary because
“the Russian government
is attempting to censor
what their citizens can
see and say online in
order to obscure the
truth and silence
dissent.”
Russian
freedom-of-information
activists are skeptical
of the motivations
behind what they say
appears to be an
organized anti-VPN scare
campaign.
“I don’t believe that
the authorities suddenly
started noticing a lot
of data theft and
decided to use such a
campaign to protect
people,” said Stanislav
Shakirov, head of the
Internet-monitoring
group Roskomsvoboda.
“Most likely they
noticed that more and
more people are using
VPNs and they decided to
try this to influence
their core electorate --
people who don’t know
much about technology
and can’t tell what is
true and what is not.”
Nonetheless, Shakirov
cautioned, there are
free VPNs that do mine
user data.
“VPN services cost
money,” he said. “If the
clients aren’t paying,
that means they have to
get the money somewhere
else.”
Companies also
reportedly slow down
their free VPNs to usher
users toward paid
services.