Gartner
Sees Low Levels Of Employee Misconduct Reporting
November
30, 2022
As
Chief Compliance Officers (CCOs) continue to face challenges in restoring
employee misconduct reporting to pre-pandemic levels, there are three strategies
they should implement to increase confidence in their processes among employees,
according to Gartner, Inc.
“There are clearly structural challenges that have impaired effective misconduct
reporting, ranging from new working models, to higher employee turnover, and
increased societal polarization,” said Chris Audet, vice president, research, in
the Gartner Legal, Risk & Compliance practice. “While CCOs can’t fully mitigate
those factors, they can drive significant improvements in reporting rates by
addressing employee perceptions of the credibility and transparency of
misconduct reporting policies.”
Gartner research has indicated that compliance reporting has decreased by 30% in
the years since the pandemic started, primarily as a result of changes to how
and where employees work. At the same time, CCOs report to Gartner that they are
seeing an increase in harassment, bullying, and discrimination incidents across
their organizations. A study of 1,003 employees in the second quarter of 2022
showed that only 42% thought their organizations had a transparent reporting
process. The same survey showed that by improving an employee’s trust in the
reporting process from the bottom decile to the top decile increased their
likelihood to report misconduct by 38%.
Three Strategies to Restore Trust
By assessing employees’ current perceptions of the reporting process, Gartner
experts identified three effective strategies to encourage employees to speak up
when they witness misconduct.
1. Clarify Employee Expectations Upfront – Failure to provide a detailed map
of the internal investigation process leads to incorrect employee assumptions
about it. Leading companies share the steps the process will take upfront and
communicate key information about each process step to assure employees that
their reports will not be ignored.
“Many organizations use privacy concerns to obscure the details of their
investigation process from employees unnecessarily,” said Audet. “Employees can
still be alerted to the progress of an investigation, and thereby remain engaged
throughout the process, even if certain details need to remain redacted to
protect privacy. Companies can also be transparent about the issues they cannot,
and choose not, to disclose, which can hold additional value for employees.”
2.
Publicize Real Employee Experiences of the Reporting Process – Audet said
organizations must go beyond mandated top-down data reports on their
investigations and solicit specific employee feedback on where the process can
be improved and overall satisfaction with the investigation’s process. This type
of employee feedback, which can be collected in surveys or post-investigation
check-ins, helps employees better envision themselves in a similar situation and
can provide increases confidence in a successful resolution.
3. Demonstrate Transparency and Consistency in Investigation Outcomes – CCOs
often refrain from communicating disciplinary outcomes out of fear of betraying
confidentiality, potentially further disillusioning employees who perceive
inconsistency with how misconduct is managed within their organizations. While
CCOs cannot entirely overcome this challenge without the partnership of HR and
other functions, they can take a leading role in communicating their company’s
misconduct escalation standards, demonstrate that the standards are being
applied consistently across the organization, and choose to publicize the
outcomes of specific misconduct cases in corporate bulletin boards or compliance
newsletters.